|
Surface roughening
|
|
| |
|
We must texture the surface in such a way that the reflection of
light is reduced. This can be done by "grooving" or by any other way that produces surface textures that direct
reflected light back at the Si | |
|
| |
|
The example on the right shows a light path that will still end up in the Si
even after two reflections took place. | |
| |
|
Regular Si, as we know, looks like a metal, i.e. silvery-shiny - in other
words it reflects light quite well. Measures for decreasing reflection are absolutely essential - already for low efficiency
solar cells. Working on anti-reflection measures might be far more important for high-efficiency solar cells (i.e. l = 20 %) than improving junction properties! | |
| |
| | |
| |
|
|
Surface Cleaning |
|
| |
|
Your mother is right! Cleanliness is next to Godliness, indeed. At least if you
want to make solar cells (or any other semiconductor device). |
| |
|
We had looked a the particle and contamination problem in the context of integrated
circuits before; with solar cell production we have essentially
the same problems. |
| |
|
OK - solar cell structures might not be quite as sensitive to contamination than
a 3 nm gate oxide, but then we also don't want to run our production in an expensive super-cleanroom either. Finding
efficient cleaning procedures is a good idea and essential for success. |
| |
| |
|
|
Diffusion |
|
| |
|
Now we form the necessary pn-junction by diffusion. If our substrate wafer
is p-type (the standard at present (2008)), we diffuse some phosphorous into the front side to a junction depth of
< 1 µm (which is far thinner than the red line in the picture!). Note that we do not
ion-implant the P to form the emitter of the solar cell (that's what we call this layer) as we would always do in microelectronics -
far too expensive! |
| |
|
We go back to an old-fashioned (and cheap) technique: We "somehow" smear some P-containing
stuff on the Si surface and heat it up. P will out-diffuse from the source layer and penetrate into the Si
if we do it right. |
| |
|
One version for this is to use the so-called "POCl"
process - we have encountered that before. But
whatever - we will usually end up with a pn-junction all around the wafer; front-side, backside and edges, which
is, of course, not good. |
|
| | |
|
|
Edge Isolation |
|
| |
|
We now remove the pn-junction around the edges, which otherwise would provide an electrical
short-cut between front and back! |
|
|
|
Quite easy to draw. How about doing it? Can you come up with a viable process for this (good,
quick, cheap, ...)? No! Well - it's not that easy. Obviously we have another quite solar-cell specific process here. |
| |
|
One way to do is to stack a lot of wafers until you have a block. Then just etch off a few
µm of the surface by plasma etching. |
| |
|
One way for achieving edge isolation. There are other ways - and they are more or less confidential,
once more |
| |
| |
|
|
Passivation |
|
| |
|
We need to passivate the surfaces, i.e. remove surface
states from the bandgap. Since we have a lot of surface it may act as very efficient "recombination center"
where we loose our light-generated minority carriers. |
|
|
|
We can only have a high-efficiency solar cell by definition if pretty much all minority carriers
generated by the light will reach the front contact. This means that we must prevent
internal recombination at point defects, other lattice defects, internal interfaces like grain boundaries and
at the front and backside surface by all means. |
|
|
|
The picture shows how its done: deposit some layer (like SiO2?)! Yes - but!
Again, we have a crucial process where you don't want to share your know-how with your competitors. At present it appears
that the company Suntech has found a particularly efficient way of doing this, all other companies try to catch up, but
are clearly behind. |
| |
| | |
|
Printing Contacts |
|
| |
|
We now have to make the front side grid and the full-size backside contact. In other words,
the tricky part is that we have to have a structured metal on the front side. |
| |
|
No problem, you might think; we have done this before. Deposit
the metal, structure by lithography and etching.
Forget it. Far too expensive (not to mention too slow). |
|
|
|
We structure by screen-printing some goo or paste containing
the desired metal particles on the solar cell. If you don't know how screen printing works in principle, look it up. We
might do the same thing on the backside; there it is rather trivial because we do not need to structure. |
| |
|
Sounds simple, is simple - but: It's a "rough" process, and if you damage the front
just a tiny bit, your solar cell will be junk. What exactly do you use as the "paste"? Once more we have a special
and crucial process with plenty of confidential know-how involved. |
|
| | |
|
|
Sintering Contacts |
|
| |
|
So far we only have some paste in the proper places. To get a metallic contact, we have to
sinter the paste - in the usual way we make, e.g., ceramics out
of paste. |
| |
|
All that it takes is heat - we have a second high-temperature process. Instead of putting
batches of wafers into a conventional furnace, we rather run them on some conveyor band through a long tunnel furnace (similar to making
bricks). Once more we have a solar-cell specific process, quite tricky in reality, that is done with some special equipment. |
| |
|
If we are really smart and thrifty we will diffuse some boron into the backside at the same
time in order to produce a back-surface field (BSF). What we are producing then
is a p+p "junction" that carries a (relatively small) electrical field with it that will repel
all minority carriers (i.e. electrons) that strayed to the backside in their random walk, giving them a change to reconsider
and to go to the front side where we want to collect them. In addition, a p+ doped backside makes for
an easier ohmic contact. |
| |
| | |
|
Now we are almost done. We just put some anti-reflection coating on the surface
that also serves as a protective layer, attach some leads ("wires") to strategic places so we can actually connect
our solar cell to other, and, not to forget, measure everything we need to measure - within 1 s - to characterize
our individual solar cell electrically. |
|
Famous Last Words |
| |
|
What is described above are the bare essentials of making bulk Si solar
cells. It actually doesn't matter much at this level of unsophistication if you start with multi-crystalline Si or
single crystals, the general processes are the same. |
|
|
A number of essential "tricks" have not been addressed at all. In particular,
we must keep the impurities from being too harmful by using processes like "gettering"
and "hydrogen passivation". |
|
|
Nevertheless, if you can come up with the cash (about 50 Mio $) and
if you have a source of state-of-the art multi-crystalline Si (hard
to find in 2008), you can buy a complete solar cell factory from some companies that will churn
out decent solar cells almost automatically. The only problem is that if you do only this, you will go broke in a few
years because your competitors, who actually understand what they are doing, will have better and cheaper solar cells on
the market. |
|
So here is a prediction concerning the future: |
| |
Nobody knows how we will make solar cells in 10 - 15 years from
now. All we know is that we will make 'em better, cheaper and that we will make far, far more then we make today |
|
|
Here is some sage advice: Buy stock from the right
solar cell company now, and you will be rich in 20 years. (If you send me large amounts of money, I might tell you
which company is "right"). |
© H. Föll (Semiconductor Technology - Script)