|
Now you must solve a simple looking integral. There are several ways of doing
that |
|
|
- Find a good math book with lots of integrals and take the solution from there (the "Bronstein", however, won't
do)
- Do a sensible approximation and solve it yourself in a simple way
- Go all the way and solve it completely - if you can.
|
|
|
Here we go the second route. |
|
We use a Taylor expansion for 1/u around u0
because that's where u is felt most critically - for large values of u everything tends to be
zero anyway. In full generality we have |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If we keep it really simple, we could just use the first term, having 1/u »
1/u0; but we will go one step beyond this and take |
|
|
|
|
|
This gives us |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The second term of the Taylor expansion brought in the factor [1 –
kT0/E] and since kT0 « E in all normal cases, it is indeed not
very important. If we neglect it, we may simply give the desired solution as |
| |
L = |
æ ç è |
2D0 · kT0
l · E |
ö ÷ ø |
1/2 | · exp |
|
E 2kT0 |
|
|
|
Now we can look at some typical cases and see what this formula means. However,
first we have to find the right values for l |
|
|
For this we have to take the given values of the initial cooling rate, which
we call l', and see what l values correspond to these cooling rates.
|
|
|
The initial cooling rate l' is the derivative of the T(t)
function at t = t0 = 0, we thus have |
| |
d dt |
(T0 · exp – l · t |
÷ ÷ |
t = 0 |
= |
l' = |
– l ·T0 · exp –l · t |
÷ ÷ |
t = 0 |
= – l ·T0 |
|
|
|
|
and obtain |
|
|
|
|
|
The "–" sign cancels, because our l'
must carry a minus sign, too, if it is to be a cooling and not a heating rate. |
|
Replacing l by l'/T0
yields the final formula: |
| |
L = |
æ ç è |
2D0 · kT02
l' · E |
ö ÷ ø |
1/2 | · exp |
|
E 2kT0 |
|
|
|
|
We have to evaluate this formula for cooling rates l' given
as (–) 1 oK/s, 10 oK/s, 50 oK/s, 104
oK/s, and activation energies of E = 1.0 eV, 2.0 eV, 5 eV. For D0
we take D0 = 10–5 cm2s–1. |
|
|
The result (including the [1 – kT0/E] term is shown
below |
| |
|
|
What can we learn from the formula and the curves? |
|
|
- The cooling rate is not all that important. Differences in the cooling rate of a factor of 50 produce only an
order of magnitude effect or less since L is only proportional to (1/l)1/2.
- The starting temperature T0 is slightly more important than the activation energy E;
both have the same weight in the exponential, but T0 appears directly in the pre-exponential while
E enters only as square root.
- The pre-exponential factor D0 of the diffusion coefficient is exactly as important
as l' and E in the pre-exponential factor of the equation for L
|
|
|
What can we do with the numbers? Quite simple:
- L gives you the average of the largest distance between some point defect agglomerates, e.g. precipitates,
because point defects farther away than L from some nuclei cannot reach it and must form their own agglomerate.
- The average number of point defects in an agglomerate divided by L3 gives a lower limit for
the point defect concentration, because at least as many point defects as we find in an agglomerate must have been in the
volume L3.
|
|
| |
© H. Föll (Defects - Script)