In this section we will discuss consequences of Le Chatelier‘s principle:
When subjected to an external influence the state of the system at equilibrium shifts
in that direction which tends to nullify the effect of the external influence.
Typical external effects
which may induce a shift in equilibrium are pressure, temperature, but also e. g. applying external electrical potentials
to an electrochemical system.
The starting point for this discussion is the fundamental equation for
thermodynamic equilibrium
| \begin{equation*} dG = V dp - S dT + \sum_j \mu_j dn_j = 0 \quad . \end{equation*} | (3.1) |
Taking mechanical and thermal equilibrium, i.e. \(dp = dT = 0\), we get
| \begin{equation*} dG_{p,T} = \sum_j \mu_j dn_j = 0 \quad . \end{equation*} | (3.2) |
Introducing the extent of reaction \(\xi\), e.g. for \(A \leftrightarrow B\),
| \begin{equation*} d\xi = \frac{dn_B}{\nu_B}= dn_B = \frac{dn_A}{\nu_A} = - dn_A \quad , \end{equation*} | (3.3) |
we finally get
| \begin{equation*} dG_{p,T} = - \mu_A d\xi + \mu_B d \xi = (\mu_B - \mu_A) d\xi \quad , \end{equation*} | (3.4) |
leading to the definition of a reaction energy
| \begin{equation*} \Delta_r G = \frac{dG_{p,T}}{d\xi} = \mu_B - \mu_A \quad . \label{D_r_G} \end{equation*} | (3.5) |
This equation is the fundamental justification for the name ”chemical potential” because the difference of chemical potentials is the driving force for chemical reactions (which can be directly extracted from the slope of the Gibbs potential vs. the extent of reaction \(\xi\)).
As illustrated in Fig. 3.1 a) we distinguish three cases:
Equilibrium condition: \(\Delta_r G = 0 \)
Exergonic, spontaneous for the forward reaction: \(\Delta_r G \lt 0 \)
Endergonic, spontaneous for the reverse reaction: \(\Delta_r G \gt 0 \)
In the general case we have
| \begin{equation*} dG_{p,T} = \sum_j \mu_j dn_j = \sum_j \mu_j \nu_j d\xi \quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta_r G = \left(\frac{dG}{d\xi} \right)_{p,T} = \sum_j \mu_j \nu_j \quad , \end{equation*} | (3.6) |
leading to
In equilibrium \(\Delta_r G = 0\), i.e.
which is one version of the famous mass action law where \(K_p\) is the equilibrium
constant for pressures.
Correspondingly we define
we get a second representation of the mass action law for
concentrations.
The principle of Le Chatelier now tells how \(K\) (resp. \(\ln K\) or \(\Delta_r G^0\)) and thus equilibrium concentration (resp. activities) or partial
pressure (resp. fugacity) change on external effects. Examples are
cooling favors the heat producing reaction: \(2 \text{NO}_2 = \text{N}_2 \text{O}_4 - \Delta H\).
applying pressure to gases favors reaction with less particles produced.
more complex scenarios may combine both effects: \( \quad\mbox{High }\; T \rightarrow
\quad \text{N}_2 + 3 \text{H}_2 = 2 \text{NH}_3 - \Delta H \quad \leftarrow \mbox{High }\; p\)
A high
temperature is needed for the activation of \(\text{N}_2\), but the consequently occurring increase of \(p\) is critical for the processes. Workarounds can be A) Use of catalysts or B) Removal of products.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
© J. Carstensen (TD Kin II)