Dia-, Para-, and Ferromagnetism
We want to get an idea of what happens to materials in external magnetic fields. "Material", in contrast to a single atom, means that we have plenty of (possibly different) atoms in close contact, i.e with some bonding. We can distinguish two basic cases: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1. The atoms of the material have no magnetic moment of their own. This is generally true for about one half of the elements; the ones with even atomic numbers and therefore an even number of electrons. The magnetic moments of the spins tends to cancel; the atoms will only have a magnetic moment if there is an orbital contribution. Of course, the situation may change if you look at ions in a crystal. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2. At least some of the atoms of the material have a magnetic moment. That covers the other half of the periodic table: All atoms with an odd number of electrons will have one spin moment left over. Again, the situation may be different if you look at ionic crystals. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lets see what can happen if you consider interactions of the magnetic moments with each other and with a magnetic field. First, we will treat the case of solids with no magnetic moments of their constituents, i.e. diamagnetic materials. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table lists the essentials | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since you cannot expose material to a magnetic field without encountering a changing field strength dH/dt (either by turning on the field on or by moving the specimen into a field), currents will be induced that produce a magnetic field of their own. | ||
According to Lenz's law, the direction of the current and thus the field is always such as to oppose the generating forces. Accordingly, the induced magnetic moment will be antiparallel to the external field. | ||
This is called diamagnetism and it is a weak effect in normal materials. | ||
There is an exception, however: Superconductors, i.e. materials with a resistivity = 0 at low temperatures, will have their mobile charges responding without "resistance" to the external field and the induced magnetic moments will exactly cancel the external field. | ||
Superconductors (at least the "normal" ones (or "type I" as they are called) therefore are always perfectly field free - a magnetic field cannot penetrate the superconducting material. | ||
That is just as amazing as the zero resistance; in fact the magnetic properties of superconductors are just as characteristic for the superconducting state of matter as the resistive properties. | ||
There will be a backbone II module for superconductors in due time |
If we now look at materials where at least some of the atoms carry a permanent magnetic moment, we have to look first at the possible internal interactions of the magnetic moments in the material and then at their interaction with an external field. Two limiting cases can be distinguished. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Strong internal interaction (i.e. interaction energies » kT, the thermal energy). Ferromagnetism results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. No or weak interaction. We have paramagnetic materials. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The first case of strong interaction will more or less turn into the second case at temperatures high enough so that kT >> interaction energy, so we expect a temperature dependence of possible effects. A first classification looks like this: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This table generated a lot of new names, definitions and question. It sets the stage for the dealing with the various aspects of ferromagnetism (including ferri- and anti-ferro magnetism as well as some more kinds of internal magnetic ordering. A few examples of ferromagnetic materials are given in the link. | ||
There might be many more types of ordering: Any fixed relation between two vectors qualify. As an example, moment 2 might not be parallel to moment 1 but off by x degrees; and the succession of many moments might form a spiral pattern. | ||
If you can think of some possible ordering (and it is not forbidden by some overruling law of nature), it is a safe bet that mother nature has already made it in some exotic substance. But, to quote Richard Feynman: | ||
"It is interesting to try to analyze what happens when a field is applied to such a spiral (of magnetic ordering) - all the twistings and turnings that must go on in all those atomic magnets. (Some people like to amuse themselves with the theory of these things!)" (Lectures on Physics, Vol II, 37-13; Feynmans emphasizes). | ||
Well, we don't, and just take notice of the fact that there is some kind of magnetic ordering for some materials. | ||
As far as the element are concerned, the only ferromagnets are: Fe, Ni, and Co. (Mn almost is one, but not quite). | ||
Examples for antiferromagnets include Cr, .... | ||
And there are many, many compounds, often quite strange mixtures (e.g. NdFeB or Sm2Co17), with remarkable and often useful ferro-, ferri, antiferro, or,..., properties. | ||
Temperature Dependence of Magnetic Behavior | |||||||||||||||||||||||
How do we distinguish an antiferromagnetic material from a paramagnet or a diamagnet? They all appear not to be very "magnetic" if you probe them with a magnetic field. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
We have to look at their behavior in a magnetic field and at the temperature dependence of that behavior. Ordering the atomic magnetic moments is, after all, a thermodynamical effect - it always has to compete with entropy - and thus should show some specific temperature dependence. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
There are indeed quite characteristic curves of major properties with temperature as shown below. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The question now will be if we can understand at least some of these observations within the framework of some simple theory, similar to what we did for dielectric materials | ||||||||||
The answer is: Yes, we can - but only for the rather uninteresting (for engineering or applications) dia- and paramagnets. | ||||||||||
Ferro magnets, however, while extremely interesting electronic materials (try to imagine a world without them), are a different matter. A real understanding would need plenty of quantum theory (and has not even been fully achieved yet); it is far outside the scope of this lecture course. But a phenomenological theory, based on some assumptions that we do not try to justify, will come straight out from the theory of the orientation polarization for dielectrics, and that is what we are going to look at in the next subchapters. | ||||||||||
|
© H. Föll (Electronic Materials - Script)