|
The film thickness is without doubt the first parameter you must measure and there
are many methods for that. Neglecting exotic or expensive methods like, for example, Rutherford
back scattering (RBS) and more indirect methods like "bevelling" plus optical microscopy, we are
left with two basic cases:
- The thin film is transparent in the optical region (including IR and UV).
Then we use optical methods.
- The thin film is opaque (i.e. metal films). Then we have a problem.
|
|
Let's deal with transparent films first. What we generally do is to use interference
effects; which give clear signals if the phase difference between two interfering beams is just a fraction of the wavelength. |
|
|
The most simple experiment, evaluating interference colors as shown in the link, already suffices to measure film thicknesses if you are not too demanding.
Far more advanced methods exist, however, which we will treat very cursorily here. |
|
|
Reflectometry: Measure the intensity of the
reflected light as a function of the wavelength. You can even do this through a microscope, so you measure the thickness
of a small spot. The intensity of the reflected light as a function of wavelength can have a complicated shape, depending
on the film refractive index, its thickness, and the properties of the substrate (it might be transparent, too). The method
still gives (even more complicated) spectra if several (more or less transparent) films are on top of each other. Except
for the simplest cases, an evaluation of the spectra obtained needs powerful software. If such a software exists, matching
the measured data against models of the layer system often allows to extract the information desired. |
|
|
Ellipsometry. The probably most powerful technique
- an ellipsometer is standard equipment in any thin film environment. A monochromatic
polarized light beam is directed under a certain angle a on the specimen; the intensity
and the change of the polarization cause by film(s) and substrate is measured. For simple systems (transparent film of suitable
thickness on known flat substrate), it is comparatively easy to extract the film thickness and
its index of refraction directly from the data. Even a film thickness as small as » 1
nm can be assessed. For more complicated systems - see above. If the wave length and / or the angle of incidence can
be changed, too, the method becomes extremely powerful and extremely complicated. |
|
Now let's look at opaque films. |
|
|
If you have an area on your sample where you have no film, just run a stylus
across the sample and measure the step height as you hit the film. This is a major and mature technique that was (and still
is) linked to the brand name "Dektak".
Don't confuse a "Dektak" with an AFM or STM! |
|
|
Measure the resistivity of the thin film - directly or indirectly. Assuming that
its specific resistivity it is that of the bulk material, and knowing the lateral dimensions, you can calculate the thickness.
There are many and partially quite sophisticated ways of measuring thin film resistivity. Even if you are not sure about
the specific resistivity, you may simply calibrate your measure values for various thicknesses by comparison with an absolute
standard. Of course, this works best it your thin film is on an insulating substrate. |
|
|
Your absolute standard comes from looking at a cross section with an electron
microscope that has sufficient resolution. Look at the TEM picture of the SiO2 layer in the link.
You build-in ruler is the lattice constant; you can't get much more precise than that. |
| |
|
Density / Porosity / Uniformity |
| |
|
The last topic - uniformity - is
the simplest one in principle: just measure whatever at many points. It may not be so easy in practice, however, but we
will not go into details because what you do depends very much on what you have and what you want. |
|
This leaves us with density / porosity.
Both term are almost inverse synonyms: if the density is not what it should be, your film must be porous in a very general
sense. |
|
|
Since the index of refraction is simply a relatively straight forward function
of porosity as long as the pores are far smaller than the wavelength of the light, ellipsometry gives you already some ideas
about that. |
|
|
There are many other methods. Often you take the property that is sensitive to
porosity as the vehicle for characterization of porosity or density. For example, there are many ways of producing thin
films of SiO2 that are very similar in many properties but may show quite different etch rates in HF
(the almost only chemical dissolving SiO2). Somehow the etching rate is tied to "porosity" (with
"pores < nm) or the structural integrity, or to whatever you like to call it. |
| |
© H. Föll (Semiconductor Technology - Script)